Skip to main content

Defaulters photo can be published

  SLP(C) NO. 37726 of 2013


  ITEM NO.58                              COURT NO.10                 SECTION IX

                               S U P R E M E C O U R T O F     I N D I A
                                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

  Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 37726/2013

  (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28/11/2013
  in WPL No. 2808/2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature at
  Bombay)

  D.J.EXIM(INDIA) PVT.LTD AND ORS                                     Petitioner(s)

                                                 VERSUS

  SBI,MUMBAI & ORS                                   Respondent(s)
  [With prayer for interim relief and office report)
  WITH
  T.P.(C) No. 691/2014
  [ALLAHABAD BANK V. M/S REVATI CEMENTS PVT. LTD.]
  (With Office Report)

  Date : 14/07/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

  CORAM :
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH

  For Petitioner(s)                 Mr. Sowridev, Adv.
  In SLP 37726                      Mr. Munawwar Naseem, Adv.

  in TP 691                         Mr.   C. Mukund, Adv.
                                    Mr.   Ashok Jain, Adv.
                                    Mr.   Pankaj Jain, Adv.
                                    Mr.   Bijoy Kumar Jain ,Adv.

  For Respondent(s)                 Mr.   Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv.
                                    Mr.   Sanjay Kapur, Adv.
                                    Mr.   Anmol Chandan, Adv.
                                    Ms.   Priyanka Das, Adv.
                                    Ms.   Lekha Vishwanath, Adv.

                         UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                            O R D E R
Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by
Kalyani Gupta
                         SLP(C) NO. 37726 of 2013
Date: 2014.07.19
16:39:53 IST
Reason:

                              We find no merit in this Special Leave Petition


  PAGE NO. 1 OF 2
SLP(C) NO. 37726 of 2013




                    and the same is dismissed.       However, we leave it

                    open to the petitioners to work out their remedy in

                    accordance with law.

                    TP(C) No. 691 of 2014

                           Issue notice returnable in four weeks.

                           Dasti service, in addition, is permitted.




                    [KALYANI GUPTA]                       [SHARDA KAPOOR]
                      COURT MASTER                          COURT MASTER







PAGE NO. 2 OF 2
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

MACT - Permanent disability - calculate - compensation - Supreme Court - Part 2

1) C. K. Subramonia Iyer vs. T. Kunhikuttan Nair - AIR 1970 SC 376 2) R. D. Hattangadi vs. Pest Control (India) Ltd. - 1995 (1) SCC 551 3) Baker vs. Willoughby - 1970 AC 467 4) Arvind Kumar Mishra v. New India Assurance Co.Ltd. - 2010(10) SCALE 298 5) Yadava Kumar v. D.M., National Insurance Co. Ltd. - 2010 (8) SCALE 567) 5. The heads under which compensation is awarded in personal injury cases are the following : Pecuniary damages (Special Damages) (i) Expenses relating to treatment, hospitalization, medicines, transportation, nourishing food, and miscellaneous expenditure. (ii) Loss of earnings (and other gains) which the injured would have made had he not been injured, comprising : (a) Loss of earning during the period of treatment; (b) Loss of future earnings on account of permanent disability. (iii) Future medical expenses. Non-pecuniary damages (General Damages) (iv) Damages for pain, suffering and trauma as a consequence of the injuries. (v) Loss of amen
21 comments
Read more

Distinction between “Loss to the Estate” and “Loss of Estate”

A subtle but fundamental distinction between “Loss of Estate” and “Loss to the Estate” was discussed in Omana P.K. and others v. Francis Edwin and others (2011 (4) KLT 952). This Judgment was challenged before the Apex Court, which has now dismissed the Appeal. The question raised in this case, was whether a certain sum which the dependants received as compensation for untimely death of Judgment debtor in a motor accident is attachable in Execution Proceedings. In this case, Justice Thomas P. Joseph speaking for the Kerala High Court had held the following (relying on The Chairman, A.P.S.R.T.C, Hyderabad vs. Smt. Shafiya Khatoon and Others) Capitalized value of the income spent on the dependents, subject to relevant deductions, is the pecuniary loss sustained by the members of his family through his death. The capitalized value of his income, subject to relevant deductions, would be the loss caused to the estate by his death. In other words, what amount the dependents would have got le
1 comment
Read more

Full & Final payment - No dues certificate - end of contract

Whether after the contract comes to an end by completion of the contract work and acceptance of the final bill in full and final satisfaction and after issuance a `No Due Certificate' by the contractor Supreme Court of India Supreme Court of India R.L. Kalathia & Co. vs State Of Gujarat on 14 January, 2011 Author: P Sathasivam Bench: P. Sathasivam, B.S. Chauhan IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3245 OF 2003 R.L. Kalathia & Co Appellant(s) Versus State of Gujarat .... Respondent(s) JUDGMENT P. Sathasivam, J. 1) This appeal is directed against the judgment and final order dated 07.10.2002 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Gujarat whereby the High Court set aside the judgment and decree dated 14.12.1982 passed by the Civil Judge, (S.D.), Jamnagar directing the State Government to pay a sum of Rs.2,27,758/- with costs and interest and dismissed the Civil Suit as well as cross objections filed by the a
10 comments
Read more