Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts with the label revision jurisdiction

Review of a Judgment; Ambit & Scope with 16 Supreme Court Decisions

Supreme Court Decisions on Review 1. Meera Bhanja v. Nirmala Kumari Choudhury, (1995) 1 SCC 170 2. Aribam Tuleshwar Sharma v. Aribam Pishak Sharma, (1979) 4 SCC 389 3. Shivdeo Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1973 SC 1909 4. Satyanarayan Laxminarayan Hegde v. Mallikarjun Bhavanappa Tirumale, AIR 1960 SC 137 5. Parsion Devi v. Sumitri Devi, (1997) 8 SCC 715 6. Lily Thomas v. Union of India, (2000) 6 SCC 224 7. Patel Narshi Thakershi v. Pradyumansinghji Arjunsinghji, AIR 1970 SC 1273 8. S. Nagaraj v. State of Karnataka, 1993 Supp (4) SCC 595 9. Raja Prithwi Chand Lal Choudhury v. Sukhraj Rai, AIR 1941 SC 1 10. Rajunder Narain Rae v. Bijai Govind Singh, (1836) 1 Moo PC 117 11. Northern India Caterers (India) Ltd V. Lt. Governor of Delhi, (1980) 2 SCC 167 12. Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1965 SC 845 13. Girdhari Lal Gupta v. D.H. Mehta, AIR 1971 SC 2162 14. O.N. Mohindroo v. Distt. Judge, Delhi, AIR 1971 SC 107 15. Chandra Kante v. Sk Habib, (1975) 1 SCC 674 16. Kam...

Role of High Court in revision petition under Rent Control Act and Difference between Landlord-tenant litigation with title suit

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.167 OF 2007 M/s Boorugu Mahadev & Sons & Anr. ……Appellant(s) VERSUS Sirigiri Narasing Rao & Ors. ……Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. 1) This appeal is filed against the final judgment and order dated 06.09.2005 of the High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Civil Revision Petition No. 5228 of 2002 whereby the High Court allowed the revision petition filed by the respondents herein and set aside the judgment dated 17.09.2002 passed by the Additional Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad in R.A. No. 93 of 1998 and restored the judgment dated 31.12.1997 passed by the Principal Rent Controller Secunderabad in R.C. No. 165 of 1993. 2) In order to appreciate the issue involved in this appeal, which lies in a narrow compass, it is necessary to set out the relevant facts in brief infra. 3) The premises bearing No. 9-3-692 to 694, Regimenta...