Legal Reference Library

Madras High Court Asset Reconstruction vs The Official Liquidator on 18 April, 2006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18/04/2006 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.A.P.SHAH, CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN O.S.A.No. 214 of 2005 and O.S.A.No.215 of 2005 and C.M.P.Nos.15340 to 15343 of 2005 Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited, Rep. by its Vice President, 17th Floor, Express Towers, Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021. ..Appellant in both the appeals. -Vs- The Official Liquidator, High Court, Madras as the liquidator of SIV Industries Ltd. (in liquidation) ..Respondent in both the appeals. PRAYER: Original Side Appeals filed under Order 36 Rule II of O.S. Rules read with Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order of the learned single Judge dated 05.07.2005 made in Company Application Nos.712 and 713 of 2005 in C.P.No.17 of 2004. For Appellant :: Mr.A.L.Somayaji, Senior Counsel For M/s.Rangarajan ...

Page 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No. 5225 OF 2008 KSL & INDUSTRIES LTD. …. APPELLANT VERSUS M/S ARIHANT THREADS LTD. & ORS. …. RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT S. A. BOBDE, J. 1. This appeal is placed before us by way of a reference, made by a two-Judge Bench of this Court, C.K. Thakker and Altamas Kabir, JJ. which heard the matter on an earlier occasion and held that the appeal deserves to be allowed and that the Judgment and Order passed by the High Court is liable to be set aside. In view of a difference of opinion having arisen on the interpretation of Section 34 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as the 1 Page 2 `RDDB' Act) the matter has been referred for decision to this Bench by the Hon’ble Chief Justice of India. 2. The present appeal is preferred by KSL & Industries Ltd. (`appellant' for short) against the final Judgment an...

Delhi High Court Ritu Sharma & Another vs Shri Sandeep Sharma & Ors. on 30 August, 2011 Author: A. K. Pathak IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI  CS (OS) No. 1226/1999 * Decided on: 30th August, 2011 RITU SHARMA & ANOTHER .......Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Atul Sharma and Mr. Sardjanand Jha, Advs. Vs. SHRI SANDEEP SHARMA & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Sunil Malhotra and Ms. Sonali Malhotra, Advs. for defendant No. 3. Mr. J.C. Mahindru, Adv. for the Defendant No. 4. Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK 1. Whether the Reporters of local papers No may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to Reporter or not? No 3. Whether the judgment should be No reported in the Digest? A.K. PATHAK, J.(ORAL) 1. On 27th April, 2009 following preliminary issue was framed:- "(a) Whether this Court has territorial jurisdiction to try the present suit in respect of the propert...