1) Jyothi Ademma vs.
Plant Engineer, Nellore & Another
2) A. Trehan vs. Associated Electrical Agencies and Another
3) Regional Director, ESI Corporation vs. Francis De Costa
4) P. Asokan vs. Western Indian Plywoods Ltd., Cannanore
5) Bharagath Engineering vs. R. Ranganayaki and Another
6) National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Hamida Khatoon and Others
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.8155 OF 2014
Dhropadabai and Others Appellant(s)
Versus
M/s. Technocraft Toolings Respondent(s)
The labour Court framed two principalcssues, namely, whether the accident had occurred during course of employment of the deceased-employee, and whether
the legal heirs were entitled for grant of compensation amounting to Rs.3 lacs along with 50% penalty and interest at the rate of 18% per annum on the total amount of compensation from the date of accident till realization of compensation amount as per law.
once an employee is an “insured person” under Section 2(14) of the 1948 Act, neither he nor his dependents would be entitled to get any compensation or damages from the employer under the 1923 Act.
2) A. Trehan vs. Associated Electrical Agencies and Another
3) Regional Director, ESI Corporation vs. Francis De Costa
4) P. Asokan vs. Western Indian Plywoods Ltd., Cannanore
5) Bharagath Engineering vs. R. Ranganayaki and Another
6) National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Hamida Khatoon and Others
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.8155 OF 2014
Dhropadabai and Others Appellant(s)
Versus
M/s. Technocraft Toolings Respondent(s)
The labour Court framed two principalcssues, namely, whether the accident had occurred during course of employment of the deceased-employee, and whether
the legal heirs were entitled for grant of compensation amounting to Rs.3 lacs along with 50% penalty and interest at the rate of 18% per annum on the total amount of compensation from the date of accident till realization of compensation amount as per law.
once an employee is an “insured person” under Section 2(14) of the 1948 Act, neither he nor his dependents would be entitled to get any compensation or damages from the employer under the 1923 Act.
Comments
Post a Comment